上一题下一题
跳转到
 
 
  世界如此多姿,发展如此迅速,窥一斑未必还能知全豹。但正如万花筒一样,每一个管窥都色彩斑斓。  
 
 
  知识通道 | 学习首页 | 教师首页 | PK首页 | 知识创造首页 | 企业首页 | 登录
 
本文对应知识领域
CET6阅读训练71
作者:未知 申领版权
2010年11月22日 共有 1484 次访问 【添加到收藏夹】 【我要附加题目
受欢迎度:

    About the time that schools and others quite reasonably became interested in seeing to it that all children, whatever their background, were fairly treated, intelligence testing became unpopular.
    Some thought it was unfair to minority children. Through the past few decades such testing has gone out of fashion and many communities have indeed forbidden it.
    However, paradoxically, just recently a group of black parents filed a lawsuit (诉讼) in California claiming that the state’s ban on IQ testing discriminates against their children by denying them the opportunity to take the test. (They believed, correctly, that IQ tests are a valid method of evaluating children for special education classes.) The judge, therefore, reversed, at least partially, his original decision.
    And so the argument goes on and on. Does it benefit or harm children from minority groups to have their intelligence tested? We have always been on the side of permitting, even facilitating, such testing. If a child of any color or group is doing poorly in school it seems to us very important to know whether it is because he or she is of low intelligence, or whether some other factor is the cause.
    What school and family can do to improve poor performance is influenced by its cause. It is not discriminative to evaluate either a child’s physical condition or his intellectual level.
    Unfortunately, intellectual level seems to be a sensitive subject, and what the law allows us to do varies from time to time. The same fluctuation back and forth occurs in areas other than intelligence. Thirty years or so ago, for instance, white families were encouraged to adopt black children. It was considered discriminative not to do so.
    And then the style changed and this cross-racial adopting became generally unpopular, and social agencies felt that black children should go to black families only. It is hard to say what are the best procedures. But surely good will on the part of all of us is needed.
    As to intelligence, in our opinion, the more we know about any child’s intellectual level, the better for the child in question.
    
    
    
    
    
    
    

 

相关新闻

testtest
上善制度的炼成
新时代呼唤管理理论创新——大卫�梯斯与动态能力理论
创业的不变逻辑
创新管理需要回答的5个问题
十一、弥离
十、转院
九、生机
八、传染
七、求血

您可能对这些感兴趣  

干货分享|10本最受国外孩子喜爱的英文词典——上
从孩子的表现看父母的缺点!请家长对号入座,看看你是哪一类?
20条制作PPT的视觉原则
培训简史:培训者必知的历史轨迹
广田丰管理培训生人才培养调查报告
第4讲 作为上司的职业经理
第3讲 作为同事的职业经理
第2讲 作为下属的职业经理
第1讲 培养经理人的管理素养
酒店前台新员工上岗培训计划

题目筛选器
日期:
类型:
状态:
得分: <=
分类:
作者:
职业:
关键字:
搜索

 
 
 
  焦点事件
 
  知识体系
 
  职业列表
 
 
  最热文章
 
 
  最多引用文章
 
 
  最新文章
 
 
 
 
网站介绍 | 广告服务 | 招聘信息 | 保护隐私权 | 免责条款 | 法律顾问 | 意见反馈
版权所有 不得转载
沪ICP备 10203777 号 联系电话:021-54428255
  帮助提示    
《我的太学》是一种全新的应用,您在操作中遇到疑问或者问题,请拨打电话13564659895,15921448526。
《我的太学》